Only one marijuana-related bill remains alive in state Legislature — at least for today

With today the deadline for bills to move to their final committees, only one of the dozens of marijuana bills introduced this year in the state Legislature remains in discussion.

Senate Bill 2659, which broadens the types of products dispensaries are allowed to sell, is the only marijuana- or marijuana dispensary-related bill still alive.


The bill would update the language of existing laws to allow dispensaries to sell “transdermal devices,” as opposed to the “transdermal patches” currently permitted, thus allowing products such as injectors to be sold. The bill also includes suppositories, as well as a less stringent definition of “manufactured cannabis product.”

Of the more than 30 bills introduced this session involving medical marijuana, only SB 2659 survived. The others were tabled after failing to meet legislative deadlines.

The vast majority of the now dead bills were abandoned by early February, which is the deadline for a bill to be passed by its first committee. These bills included minor proposals, such as one House bill that would substitute all legal references to “medical marijuana” with “medical cannabis,” and sweeping alterations to the state’s marijuana laws, such as several bills that would have legalized the personal use of cannabis or repealed criminal penalties for possessing marijuana.

Among the abandoned bills were proposals to recognize out-of-state residents as qualified patients for cannabis, reschedule marijuana from a Schedule I drug to a Schedule III drug, permit the use of marijuana to treat opioid withdrawal, permit dispensaries to provide marijuana free of charge to qualifying patients under the poverty line and prohibit employers from firing employees for being qualified medical marijuana patients, among other things.

A mere handful of bills survived beyond their first committee referral in their initial chamber. SB 2651, which would have allowed dispensaries to employ felons convicted of Class C felonies not involving drugs or fraud, successfully passed the Senate Committee on Commerce, Consumer Protection and Health before failing to pass the Senate Judiciary Committee in mid-February.

An identical fate befell SB 3053, which would have allowed dispensaries to sell edible cannabis products, while the Commerce Committee deferred the similar SB 2132, which would have allowed the state Department of Health to authorize companies to partner with dispensaries to manufacture edible products.

Still more bills that were carried over from the 2017 legislative session failed to make any headway this year. SB 319 could have established a Marijuana Dispensary Special Fund if it hadn’t failed to make any headway after being reintroduced in January.

Meanwhile, two unrelated Senate bills — SB 305, relating to video monitoring at dispensaries, and SB 174, which would have broadened the list of medical conditions to qualify for medical marijuana to include epilepsy and arthritis, among others — failed to pass any committee this year despite passing third readings in both chambers last year. According to legislative records, the Senate disagreed with amendments made to each bill by the House last year, with both chambers failing to come to an agreement by a late April 2017 deadline.


Although SB 2659 is still active as of press time, it might soon join the other failed bills. The bill has to pass its final committee — the House Committee on Finance — by the end of today or it, too, will be consigned to legislative oblivion.

Email Michael Brestovansky at

  1. PUNATIC March 23, 2018 7:19 am

    Another ‘do-nothing’ session for this useless excuse of a law making body!……Hey, at least there IS, yet another, bill addressing smoking/vaping/////When oh when are we going to pass a law disenabling the legislature from wasting time on smoking bills?

    1. Hilo Jack March 23, 2018 11:59 am

      After the anti abortion bills

    2. John Kalau March 23, 2018 3:14 pm

      agree…stop electing democrats or republicans

  2. Sara Steiner-jackson March 23, 2018 7:36 am

    The State of Hawaii does not want anyone to have cannabis. Act 170 a few years back already mandated that “marijuana” was and is a racist slang term invented by racist Anslinger, Hearst and DuPonts, among others AND ORDERED THE DOH TO CHANGE ALL REFERENCES FROM MARIJUANA TO CANNABIS.

    It has been 18 years since Hawaii supposedly enacted a “compassionate care” act. Go right this minute to the DoH website, see how much the State exthorts from people who simply want to use a plant for medicine, and then search the question “where can I obtain cannabis?”

    The State is running a RICO scam against the people of Hawaii. That is right, Organized Racketeers set up a separate (lower) class of people who have to pay money to go to special doctors to get permission to use cannabis. Then you have to pay the other State Organized Racketeers to have a license to use cannabis WITHOUT HAVING TO PROVIDE THE ACTUAL CANNABIS.

    They if someone, like Mike Ruggles, tries to connect patients together to access medicine, RABID POLICE AND PROSECUTORS OFFICE HAS THE EFFIN HUEVOS TO ARREST AND CHARGE HIM WITH 33 FELONIES.

    Mikes jury trial is now set for June 18th in Hilo. All the force and power of the State can not stand up to their insincerity. The medical cannabis program in hawaii is unconstitutional. It ha created a separate distinct class of people to suck money out of without provining anything in return v

    1. John Kalau March 23, 2018 3:16 pm

      yes, Narcotics Enforcement Division is NOT interested in the welfare of Hawaii residents….until it is their pain, ptsd, etc. Got to drain this swamp too people!

  3. Carol Remington March 23, 2018 1:51 pm

    Oregon’s MM bill provided that you could either grow your own or have someone grow it for you. You just had to list the address with them, and post the notice of compliance. No doctor visit fees to get the license (you’d get a recommendation from your own doctor), and a small yearly fee made it affordable for all.

    1. Sara Steiner-jackson March 24, 2018 10:53 am

      We have that here. The problem is there are many people who cant grow their own, only one caregiver is allowed per patient. Act 178 amended the medical cannabis laws to allow for transfer between patients because after 13 years (now 18 years) there is no legal way to get medical cannabis and the Narcotics Enforcement Division, police and prosecutors have kept it this way for the last 18 years.

  4. Steve Dearing March 23, 2018 6:07 pm

    The corrupt demo rat state proves their stuck on stupid agenda is endless. Bottom line do not buy pot from the State of Hawaii.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Star-Advertiser's TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email