Trade war red meat: Trump administration sends millions to criminal Brazilian meatpackers

The Trump administration’s trade war with China was foolish from the start. Exactly how foolish is underlined twice in red in a series of Daily News reports by Chris Sommerfeldt.

Last year, President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Chinese products provoked punishing retaliatory tariffs on U.S. agricultural products. In turn, the administration created a $12 billion fund to alleviate U.S. farmers’ economic pain, as well as the political pain unleashed by farmers furious about their damaged livelihoods.


As part of that desperate bailout, throughout the past five months, the U.S. Department of Agriculture bought $62 million in pork from Brazilian-owned meatpacking giant JBS SA, owned by brothers Joesley and Wesley Batista — convicted in Brazil for bribing hundreds of officials.

Technically, the $62 million went to the Colorado-based subsidiary JBS USA. Thus, USDA says the pork “pork” is, um, kosher. Yet in November, a far smaller sum — $240,000 — was blocked from going to the Virginia-based Smithfield Foods when Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, noted the firm was owned by a Chinese conglomerate.

So how did JBS slip through the cracks at this “America First” administration, especially considering the Batistas are under investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice for possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act? We’re old enough to remember when Republicans railed against the idea of indiscriminate multi-billion-dollar corporate bailouts, especially ones that might benefit foreigners.


There’s an old Brazilian saying: Comprar gato por lebre. It means to buy a cat thinking it was a rabbit, or to prop up foreign crooks in the name of aiding patriotic Americans.

— New York Daily News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Star-Advertiser's TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email