CORRECTION: The daily bag limit for collection of Achilles tang will be reduced to five under the proposal outlined in this story. No more than five yellow tang less than 2 inches and more than 4.5 inches or kole more than 4 inches can be collected per day, according to the proposal. The final EIS assessed comments from not only a previously completed final EA, but public input from the draft EIS released last fall. The Tribune-Herald regrets the errors.
West Hawaii’s coastal waters — closed to aquarium fishing for more than two years — should reopen to just 10 commercial aquarium fishermen, a final environmental impact statement released Thursday states. Produced by the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council with help from Stantec Consulting Services, the final EIS amended its initial proposal, reducing the suggested number of Commercial Aquarium Permits issued for the West Hawaii Regional Fishery Management Area from 14 to 10.
It also includes a bag limit of five for yellow tang and kole — which combined account for more than 90% of total aquarium fish collected in the WHRFMA prior to the aquarium fishing halt by the Hawaii Supreme Court on Sept. 6, 2017 — and 10 for the Achilles tang.
The EIS is aimed at bringing the aquarium trade into compliance with the Hawaii Environmental Policy Act after the state Supreme Court ruled collection without environmental review violates the act.
The restrictions outlined in the final environmental impact statement released Thursday would limit the annual collection to less than 2% of the islandwide population: well under the 5% to 25% rate the EIS research suggests is sustainable. The proposal does not prohibit the use of fine mesh nets and limits recreational aquarium collectors without a valid commercial marine license to five fish per person per day; recreational collectors would not be able to sell any collected fish.
According to the final EIS, “No significant adverse effects would occur as a result of the Preferred Alternative,” though this conclusion was disputed as, “erroneous and unsupportable” by officials from For the Fishes, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Humane Society of the United States in a response. The final EIS selected the “Limited Permit Issuance Alternative” as the preferred alternative from among four proposals.
“Of the four action alternatives which meet the Applicant’s purpose and need, the Limited Permit Issuance Alternative is the Preferred Alternative, as it results in the lowest collection of the 40 White List Species…” stated the EIS. “In addition, the Preferred Alternative limits the geographic scope of Aquarium Permits to the WHRFMA, and it is the only Alternative under consideration which limits the number of permits that would be issued.”
No permits would be issued for any areas outside the WHRFMA, which stretches from Ka‘u to North Kohala.
The proposal projects a direct socioeconomic impact of $1.8 million to $3.7 million added to the economy over five years with an additional $9.1 million to $18.7 million in indirect impacts.
A total of 836 responses were received providing public feedback. Of those, 435 were in support of issuing aquarium permits, while 398 were in opposition; three were neutral.
Consulted during the EIS process were 12 parties and agencies including the National Marine Fisheries Service, the Coral Reef Ecosystem Program, the state Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Aquatic Resources and the state Department of Health’s Office of Environmental Quality Control.
