Democratic Socialists win court battle as elections near

An appeals court in New York tossed out an election law case Thursday that had quietly roiled the Democratic Socialists of America for years and sapped hundreds of thousands of dollars from its coffers.

In a unanimous ruling, a five-judge panel in Albany, the state capital, said that a state elections watchdog had erred when he accused the group of carrying out an illegal fundraising campaign in 2022 to help elect a slate of socialists, including Zohran Mamdani, then a state Assembly member.

An investigation into the effort, first reported by The New York Times, had wound through the state Board of Elections and courts for years. The DSA maintained its innocence throughout but had to raise funds to cover a $212,069 fine — a significant sum for a small organization.

Now, the group will get that money back just in time for the 2026 primary season, when it is attempting to capitalize on Mamdani’s election as mayor of New York City to further expand its influence in the state capital.

“This is a full and complete victory,” Gustavo Gordillo, one of the DSA’s top New York leaders, said Friday. He called the Board of Elections case “politically motivated governmental overreach” from the start.

Michael L. Johnson, the state campaign finance watchdog whose office brought the case, could appeal the ruling to the state’s highest court. But after Thursday’s unanimous decision in the Appellate Division’s 3rd Judicial Department, it would be an uphill fight.

Johnson, who was appointed by former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat, said Friday that lawmakers needed to clarify state election law to distinguish between bona fide political parties and “pseudo parties” like the DSA, which operate under different legal status and do not appear on ballots.

The decision “demonstrates that the Legislature did not anticipate this kind of conduct or provide a penalty for it,” Johnson said.

The case revolved around DSA for the Many, a special multicandidate campaign committee that the group set up before the 2022 elections. The idea was to pool resources and coordinate strategy with a dozen or so candidates for state office, including Mamdani, who could push Democrats leftward.

Such a committee allows its leaders to raise and spend nearly unlimited funds for those candidates, like a political party might do, but only if the candidates explicitly authorize it to do so in writing. (The DSA, which now counts more than 14,000 members in New York City, is growing but is not legally a political party.)

Johnson’s office asserted that DSA for the Many failed to get proper authorization paperwork, rendering its efforts a violation of the law. Lawyers for the group countered that they had such consent and had made every effort to comply but had been told by a Board of Elections representative that written sign-offs were not necessary.

A neutral hearing officer for the Board of Elections sided with Johnson, as did a lower court judge. But Thursday, the appeals court disagreed.

In its written decision, the judicial panel said that the case “fails to demonstrate respondents’ intent to violate the Election Law as alleged” and cast doubt on other contentions made by the state.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

© 2026 The New York Times Company