There was no good reason for the federal government to rush the execution last week of Daniel Lewis Lee. No good reason, that is, other than politics.
Lee was the first of five condemned prisoners Attorney General William Barr named in a July 2019 order resuming federal executions after 17 years. Barr also ordered the government to abandon the three-drug combination in favor of a single overdose of the sedative pentobarbital.
The executions have been stalled by a variety of legal challenges. Last Tuesday, however, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 ruling lifting an injunction in a case that challenged the constitutionality of using pentobarbital, and Lee was dead by breakfast time even though his legal appeals had not been exhausted.
“It is beyond shameful that the government, in the end, carried out this execution in haste, in the middle of the night, while the country was sleeping,” Ruth E. Friedman, Lee’s lawyer said Tuesday morning. It’s appalling that the government moved so quickly to execute Lee as a political gambit.
In its unsigned majority opinion, the court said the condemned men had not established that they would likely win their appeal over the constitutionality of the use of pentobarbital, even though Justice Stephen Breyer expressed doubts about the execution method in his dissent.
This execution has taken place because the Trump administration is driven to display its law-and-order toughness (except, of course, Donald Trump’s cronies) as it confronts significant reelection headwinds. But that move also spotlights some of the reasons the death penalty should be done away with.
When the attorney general gets to pick names for a death list, determining who gets executed is arbitrary. And Lee was one of two men convicted of those three murders; the other man, and by most accounts the one driving the crimes, received a life sentence. One set of crimes, two convicted murders, two different sentences, and the one with the death verdict gets to the front of the line because of the whims of the attorney general. None of this is justice.
— Los Angeles Times