Piles of evidence should be unlockable by law enforcement

Subscribe Now Choose a package that suits your preferences.
Start Free Account Get access to 7 premium stories every month for FREE!
Already a Subscriber? Current print subscriber? Activate your complimentary Digital account.

While all of us have been going about our business, cops and prosecutors have been going about theirs, collecting vital evidence with the potential to convict the guilty and exonerate the innocent. But because the devices on which this evidence increasingly sits are equipped with uncrackable encryption, they may as well be throwing them into a black hole.

Enough already.

Encryption is a critical tool. It lets dissidents in China or Iran or Russia communicate without being suffocated by repressive regimes. It lets American whistleblowers store sensitive information, then send it, without fingerprints, to journalists like us.

But it also enables criminals who traffic in child pornography to laugh at the law as they store incriminating images. It lets murderers and rapists prevent officers and prosecutors from accessing their text-message histories and address books.

Those who insist it must never be curbed are as mindlessly rigid as Second Amendment absolutists who insist all guns in all contexts should be equally beyond the reach of statutes and regulations.

In testimony to the U.S. Senate last week, Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance pointed to a better way. His staff obtains an average of 1,600 devices, almost all of them smartphones, each year. Today, more than 80% of those are encrypted.

Nearly one in five are connected to sex crimes. One in eight, to homicides or attempted murder. One in four are associated with fraud, cybercrimes or identity theft — a scourge in modern-day America that ironically is getting harder to prosecute.

The DA has ways to try to defeat the encryption manufactured into the devices by Apple and Google, who wrote the operating systems, but they only work in half the cases. And they take time. As weeks and months go by, cases get harder to solve. Statutes of limitations lapse.

Vance wants a new law to require tech companies to grant cops and prosecutors access when they have a valid, court-ordered search warrant, provided their search is limited to “data at rest,” which is to say, files already stored on the device.

From DNA to surveillance cameras, technology has been a great blessing to law-enforcement. Here, it is a creeping curse.

— New York Daily News