Trump derides nation-building, but his Afghanistan plan requires it

Subscribe Now Choose a package that suits your preferences.
Start Free Account Get access to 7 premium stories every month for FREE!
Already a Subscriber? Current print subscriber? Activate your complimentary Digital account.

There’s only one real indicator of victory in Afghanistan, and President Donald Trump skipped past it in his speech Monday night. Victory in this nearly 16-year U.S. war will come when the Afghan people stand unified behind their government, willing to risk their lives to defend their own country from internal and external threats.

There’s only one real indicator of victory in Afghanistan, and President Donald Trump skipped past it in his speech Monday night. Victory in this nearly 16-year U.S. war will come when the Afghan people stand unified behind their government, willing to risk their lives to defend their own country from internal and external threats.

Deep within his speech on the way forward in Afghanistan, Trump did underscore the importance of Afghans taking greater responsibility, but it was buried in macho references to Americans “attacking our enemies” and “obliterating ISIS.” Until Afghans come to value nationhood and the freedoms that accompanied the 2001 U.S. ouster of Taliban oppressors, they will forever be locked in a cycle of war and militia dominance.

The resulting security vacuum is what makes Afghanistan easy prey for terrorist groups, which is why the United States cannot afford to withdraw. It’s a vicious cycle.

The same conditions marked the Iraq War, which sucked away $1.7 trillion in U.S. funding. Thousands of U.S. troops died, while the Iraqi population did little to defend their own nation’s sovereignty. That’s what opened the door to Islamic State terrorists in 2014. Only after Iraqis unified and began fighting back did ISIS begin retreating and government sovereignty return.

That’s what victory looks like. That’s nation-building. It wouldn’t have happened without hard-nosed diplomacy and ongoing U.S. assistance, including air support and military advisers serving on the front lines under a strategy implemented by President Barack Obama.

But Trump went out of his way to criticize Obama and deride the concept of nation-building. He added that the United States would continue to use economic development aid as a way of promoting Afghanistan’s stability. Economic assistance is nation-building.

America must stand for basic human rights around the world. Women have a right to work. Girls have a right to attend school. Women must never be imprisoned or killed for being raped. Under the Taliban, these conditions existed. Insisting that any economic or military aid be conditioned on ongoing efforts to protect women’s rights is, yes, nation-building. And it’s worth fighting for.

Trump publicly criticized Pakistan, demanding it stop destabilizing Afghanistan and do more to eliminate terrorist safe havens in Pakistan’s autonomous tribal areas.

Trump has a point, but the Islamabad government feels that the tens of thousands of lives Pakistan has sacrificed in the anti-terrorism fight earn it the right to be respected as a partner, not berated as an underling. Trump must learn the art of diplomacy.

Likewise with his appeal for NATO to contribute more troops and funding for Afghanistan after spending months openly criticizing NATO and insulting its leaders. If this is how he plans to achieve victory in Afghanistan, a very long slog awaits.

— St. Louis Post-Dispatch