Rail bill would raise TAT by 1 percent

Subscribe Now Choose a package that suits your preferences.
Start Free Account Get access to 7 premium stories every month for FREE!
Already a Subscriber? Current print subscriber? Activate your complimentary Digital account.

HONOLULU — In order to provide the City and County of Honolulu with the funding to complete its $8.2 billion rail project, House and Senate committee chairs have drafted a bill that will be considered during a special legislative session next week, lawmakers announced late Thursday.

HONOLULU — In order to provide the City and County of Honolulu with the funding to complete its $8.2 billion rail project, House and Senate committee chairs have drafted a bill that will be considered during a special legislative session next week, lawmakers announced late Thursday.

House Speaker Scott K. Saiki, D-Honolulu, said the $2.378 billion funding shortfall package will fund the rail project up to Ala Moana and would preserve $1.55 billion in federal funding.

“By working with our colleagues in the Senate, the Legislature has come up with a concrete plan to fund the rail project that will reduce the overall costs, while shifting some of the regressive tax burden away from our residents, who are struggling to make ends meet,” Saiki said. “This plan will not have a direct impact on neighbor island county budgets.”

According to lawmakers, the proposed bill will:

• Extend the general excise tax surcharge on Oahu for three additional years, from Dec. 31, 2027, through Dec. 31, 2030. This will provide $1.046 billion.

• Raise the hotel room tax charged to visitors (Transient Accommodation Tax) by 1 percent, from 9.25 percent to 10.25 percent, for 13 years, from Jan. 1, 2018, to Dec. 31, 2030. This also applies to timeshares. This will provide $1.326 billion.

• Retain the current method of collecting the hotel room tax. It is collected statewide and goes directly into the general fund, not to the island where it is collected. Each county receives a specified amount of the tax regardless of total amounts collected. Raising the tax does not change that amount.

• Permanently increase the counties’ share of the TAT from its current $93 million base to $103 million.

• Reduce the state Department of Taxation’s administrative fee on the GET surcharge from 10 percent to 1 percent.

• Require a state-run audit of the rail project and annual financial reviews.

Lawmakers said the bill also provides that funds collected for rail go into a new Mass Transit Special Fund, and rather than simply give the money to the city, the state comptroller will review and disburse the funds to the city for its costs as the project moves forward. This will allow the state to keep track of spending and construction progress.

The GET surcharge is automatically transferred to the city on a quarterly basis without any oversight. The proposed bill will change that practice to ensure accountability and transparency by having the comptroller review and approve the expenses. It also establishes better internal control and ensures that waste and fraud does not occur, lawmakers said.

This bill addresses the immediate rail construction shortfall by collecting funds upfront through the TAT increase, instead of adding additional years of GET surcharge on the back end. This likely will reduce the financing costs of the project by hundreds of millions of dollars, they said.

“We have taken a long look at the rail project and have heard the concerns of residents during our joint public hearing on rail funding this month,” Saiki said. “This is a critical infrastructure project for Hawaii. We are not giving the city a blank check but instead insisting on audits and financial reviews and expenditures to provide complete transparency for our taxpayers.”

Senate President Ron Kouchi, D-Kauai-Niihau, said he supports the draft bill because it “includes a permanent increase in the counties’ share of the TAT from its current $93 million base to $103 million.”

“I am hopeful that this compromise legislation will satisfy … construction cost concerns as testified to numerous times by the City and County of Honolulu,” Kouchi said.