When a driverless car makes an illegal u-turn, who gets the ticket?

A photo provided by the San Bruno Police Department shows a police officer pulling over a driverless Waymo taxi after it made an illegal U-turn in San Bruno, Calif., a suburb of San Francisco. California approved a law last year allowing the police to cite autonomous vehicles, but it did not specify any penalties, and the law doesn’t take effect until 2026. (San Bruno Police Department via The New York Times) — NO SALES; EDITORIAL USE ONLY —
Subscribe Now Choose a package that suits your preferences.
Start Free Account Get access to 7 premium stories every month for FREE!
Already a Subscriber? Current print subscriber? Activate your complimentary Digital account.

Two officers in San Bruno, California, a suburb of San Francisco, were checking for drunken drivers over the weekend when they saw a car make an illegal U-turn right in front of them. But it wasn’t a drunken driver. It was a driverless Waymo taxi.

The officers turned on the flashing lights on their police car and pulled behind the Waymo, which automatically came to a stop. But the officers could do little else other than tell a Waymo representative what had happened.

“Since there was no human driver, a ticket couldn’t be issued,” the San Bruno Police Department said in a statement on Facebook that included a photo of an officer peering into the empty driver’s seat of the taxi. “(Our citation books don’t have a box for ‘robot’).”

The bizarre traffic stop pointed to the challenge law enforcement officials face in trying to ticket autonomous vehicles for moving violations that would be routine if a human driver were behind the wheel.

Last year, Gov. Gavin Newsom of California signed a law authorizing the police to issue “notices of autonomous vehicle noncompliance” when they see driverless cars breaking local traffic laws. But the law did not specify any penalties associated with those notices and it does not take effect until July 1, 2026.

Until then, there are no clear rules in California governing how to enforce local traffic laws for autonomous vehicles, said Sgt. Scott Smithmatungol of the San Bruno Police Department’s Traffic Division. Enforcement “feels like it’s still in the beta-testing stage,” he said.

Waymo said in a statement that its autonomous driving system, known as the Waymo Driver, was “designed to respect the rules of the road.” After reviewing the traffic stop in San Bruno, the company said it took “immediate steps to address this” and was “committed to improving road safety through our ongoing learnings and experience.”

Smithmatungol said it was early Saturday morning, just after midnight, when he and another officer saw the Waymo make the illegal U-turn from a left-turn-only lane, right next to a posted no U-turn sign. Smithmatungol and his partner drove behind the Waymo with their vehicle’s lights flashing, and the taxi stopped. (The vehicles, Waymo says, are designed to pull over in a safe place when they detect police lights and sirens.)

Smithmatungol’s partner approached the vehicle and looked inside. “Oh, no one’s in it,” he said.

The officers, relying on their training from Waymo, used the taxi’s two-way communication system to contact a Waymo representative, who thanked them for reporting the illegal U-turn, Smithmatungol said. Then the officers drove off, leaving the Waymo behind.

“Hopefully the reprogramming will keep it from making any more illegal moves,” the San Bruno police said in a statement.

Unlike California, Arizona has a state law that allows police to issue traffic citations to driverless vehicles, just as they would to regular drivers.

© 2025 The New York Times Company