Judge skeptical of requests to muzzle Trump attacks on FBI

Swipe left for more photos

In an undated image provided by the Southern District of Florida, Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Shortly after Judge Cannon drew the assignment in June 2023 to oversee former President Donald Trump’s classified documents case, two more experienced colleagues on the federal bench in Florida urged her to pass it up and hand it off to another jurist, according to two people briefed on the conversations. (Southern District of Florida via The New York Times) — NO SALES; FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY. —
FILE PHOTO: Former U.S. President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump attends a campaign event in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S., June 22, 2024. REUTERS/Tom Brenner/File Photo
Subscribe Now Choose a package that suits your preferences.
Start Free Account Get access to 7 premium stories every month for FREE!
Already a Subscriber? Current print subscriber? Activate your complimentary Digital account.

FORT PIERCE, Florida — The judge overseeing Donald Trump’s classified-documents case reacted skeptically on Monday to a request from prosecutors to bar the former president from making statements that could endanger law enforcement agents who have worked on the case.

At a hearing in federal court in Florida, U.S. Judge Aileen Cannon pressed prosecutors for evidence that Trump’s false claims that the FBI had been authorized to assassinate him has led to violent threats against agents working on the case.

“There still needs to be a connection between alleged dangerous statements” and the risk of physical harm by Trump’s supporters, she said.

On social media and in fundraising messages, Trump has falsely claimed that a routine FBI use-of-force policy authorized agents to attempt an assassination when they raided his Mar-a-Lago estate in 2022 and seized boxes of documents he had taken from the White House.

Trump has pleaded not guilty to charges he illegally held onto sensitive national security papers after leaving office in 2021 as well as obstructing government efforts to retrieve them.

Judges overseeing two of these cases have imposed partial gag orders on Trump to try to rein in his verbal attacks on prosecutors, witnesses and other participants.

Prosecutors from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office say he should face limits in this case as well. “These types of statements are nowhere close to the line,” prosecutor David Harbach told Cannon.

Cannon did not seem inclined to agree, reprimanding Harbach when he objected to her frequent interruptions. She has previously denied the request on procedural grounds.

Trump’s criticism over the FBI search of his Mar-a-Lago social club intensified last month after the FBI’s use-of-force policy was made public along with other records related to the operation.

The policy stipulated that the FBI could not use lethal force unless an agent or other person was at serious risk of death or serious injury. Trump was not present at the club at the time of the search.