Trump posts $91.6 million bond for defamation judgment in Carroll case

E. Jean Carroll departs a Manhattan federal court at the conclusion of her defamation suit against Donald Trump on Jan. 26, 2024, in New York City. A New York jury has awarded Carroll 83.3 million dollars in her civil trial against Trump. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images/TNS)
Subscribe Now Choose a package that suits your preferences.
Start Free Account Get access to 7 premium stories every month for FREE!
Already a Subscriber? Current print subscriber? Activate your complimentary Digital account.

NEW YORK — Donald Trump on Friday posted a $91.6 million bond in a defamation case he recently lost to writer E. Jean Carroll, staving off a potential legal and financial disaster just days before a deadline to secure the deal.

The bond, provided by an outside insurance company, will prevent Carroll from collecting the judgment while Trump appeals.

A federal jury awarded Carroll $83.3 million in January, and Trump recently asked that the judgment be paused. The judge presiding over the case, Lewis Kaplan, denied Trump’s request for a preliminary reprieve, putting pressure on Trump to either come up with the money himself or secure the bond.

With a Monday deadline looming, Trump posted the bond, which is higher than the $83.3 million judgment because the former president is also responsible for interest.

The bond is a promise from the company offering it — Federal Insurance Co., an arm of the insurance giant Chubb — to cover Trump’s judgment if he loses his appeal and fails to pay. In exchange, Trump must pay the company a premium and pledge collateral, including as much cash as possible.

In a court filing Friday morning, Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba, asked Kaplan to approve the bond as “adequate and sufficient” to block Carroll from collecting the award before Trump’s appeal is decided.

In a statement, Habba said she was “highly confident” that an appeals court “will overturn this egregious judgment,” citing “numerous prejudicial errors” made at trial.

A Trump campaign spokesperson, Steven Cheung, said in a statement that the bond had been filed “in the full amount of the baseless judgment in the Democrat-funded Carroll Witch Hunt, which is being appealed and litigated.”

Carroll’s lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, declined to comment Friday. Carroll herself called the bond a “stupendous amount,” in a social media post.

“Though the illustrious Robbie Kaplan is strong enough to yank a golden toilet out of the floor at Trump Tower and toss it through the window, this bond saves Robbie the trouble of showing up with U.S. marshals on Monday to do so,” Carroll wrote.

The terms of Trump’s bond deal have not been publicly disclosed, but bonding companies often charge a fee of anywhere between 1% and 3% and require enough collateral to cover the bond.

Chubb, in a statement, said it did not comment on “client-specific” information but that it provided appeal bonds in the normal course of business. “These bonds are an ordinary and important part of the American justice system, protecting the rights of both defendants and plaintiffs,” the company said.

The judge, in a brief order Friday, gave Carroll until 11 a.m. Monday to file any response to the proposed bond and said that if she had any opposition to its form or amount, he would hold a hearing that afternoon on the matter.

The bond in Carroll’s case removes, at least for now, just one of the many looming threats from Trump’s legal docket, which also includes four criminal indictments, the first of which is going to trial in about two weeks.

In a separate civil case, Trump faces a judgment of more than $450 million levied by a New York state judge in a fraud lawsuit brought by Attorney General Letitia James. The judge, Arthur Engoron, sided with James, concluding that Trump had fraudulently inflated his net worth to reap favorable loan terms and other financial benefits.

Trump recently asked a state appeals court to accept only a $100 million bond in that case. His lawyers said it would be “impossible” to obtain a bond for the full amount, which is $454 million and counting with interest.

A single appeals court judge turned down his request, but Trump can try again before a full panel of five appellate court judges.

Unless that panel cuts him a break, Trump will need to post a bond for the full amount by March 25 — which happens to be the opening day of his first criminal trial. If he fails, James is expected to move swiftly to collect, seizing the former president’s bank accounts and potentially even some of his New York properties.

Although Trump estimates his net worth in the billions, much of it stems from the value of his properties. He has more than $350 million in cash and investments he can sell in a hurry, a recent New York Times analysis found, well short of what he owes between the fraud case and the defamation verdict.

The award to Carroll came in a January trial over how much she should receive in damages for defamatory statements Trump made about her in 2019 after she accused him of a decades-old rape — and for his continuing attacks on her since, on social media, at news conferences and during the trial itself.

Trump was found liable, in a separate trial last year, for sexually abusing Carroll in the mid-1990s and for making a defamatory social media post about her in 2022. The jury in that case awarded Carroll $5 million, and Trump later posted about $5.6 million in cash in a court account pending his appeal of that verdict.

Before securing the bond in the second case, Trump’s lawyers had made an alternative proposal to the judge: that Kaplan allow Trump to post a bond “in a fraction of the amount” of the award. The defense asked for the smaller bond while the judge considered the former president’s request that the verdict be thrown out.

Carroll’s lawyers had urged the judge to deny Trump’s request for a stay.

They argued that the former president had not offered any information about his finances or the nature and location of his assets, that he had not specified what portion of his assets were liquid or explained how Carroll might go about collecting her judgment, and that he had not addressed the risks of the large judgment obtained by James’ office as well as the many criminal charges Trump faces “that might end his career as a businessman permanently.”

“He simply asks the court to ‘trust me,’ and offers, in a case with an $83.3 million judgment against him, the court filing equivalent of a paper napkin, signed by the least trustworthy of borrowers,” Carroll’s lawyers wrote.

© 2024 The New York Times Company