Michael Cohen may not be ‘star witness’ material, but his testimony rings true
A serial liar and tax cheat who will be going to prison for deceiving Congress, Michael Cohen isn’t “star witness” material. And when he sat before the House Committee on Oversight and Reform on Wednesday, the panel’s Republicans — who were monomaniacal about defending President Donald Trump — pointed out again and again how sketchy Cohen’s character and how dubious his credibility are.
Yet despite his obvious character issues, Cohen’s description of Trump, whose legal problems he “fixed” for a decade, had the ring of truth: a man eager to win at all costs, who puts his self-interest ahead of the public interest, and who feels the rules don’t apply to him.
Seriously, how hard is it to imagine that Trump was aware of — and intimately involved in — hush-money payments to women he’d slept with? Do you have to reevaluate his character to believe that he remained deeply interested in a proposed Russian skyscraper that could earn him hundreds of millions of dollars even as he was running for president? Or that he would impel his underlings to lie about such things to protect his candidacy?
The hearing didn’t prove anything or bring much to light that the public hadn’t already heard, generating at best a few new leads for investigators. But what it surely did is remind us of a couple of depressing truths: that lawmakers’ virulent partisanship makes it harder for Congress to find the facts, and that a president who supposedly sought to drain the swamp has instead caused us all to be dragged through the mud by ugly people accusing each other of ugly things.
— Los Angeles Times
Forget the Michael Cohen sideshow. Give us the Robert Mueller report.
Wednesday was a day like few in American history, with a convicted liar on his way to federal prison telling the House Oversight Committee that his old boss, who happens to be the president, was an even bigger liar. But did the testimony of Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump’s former attorney, change the national debate as he rehashed stories about Trump spreading falsehoods, paying off mistresses and saying offensive, even racist, things?
It’s a sign of the times that it wasn’t more surprising that a former confidant of the president of the United States called him a racist, a con man and a cheat. Or that few Republicans actually challenged Cohen’s claims about his longtime client, choosing instead to go after Cohen’s credibility. The only thing missing from the theatrics was Trump tweets.
But if the hearing accomplished anything, it should be to whet Americans’ appetites for the completion of special prosecutor Robert Mueller’s investigation into the Trump camp’s links with Russian operatives and Moscow’s attempts to interfere in the 2016 election. Unfortunately, newly confirmed Attorney General Bob Barr has already indicated that he may withhold parts of Mueller’s report that are deemed too sensitive to make public.
Except for information that might damage national security, everything else should be released. Who knew what when? Americans should know.
— The San Diego Union-Tribune