Meet the transgender troops the trump administration is barring

SAN DIEGO — Sgt. 1st Class Julia Becraft circled up a dozen infantry soldiers at Fort Cavazos, Texas, and introduced herself as their new squad leader. She let them know they were in experienced hands: She had deployed to Afghanistan three times, seen a fair share of combat and been awarded the Bronze Star.

Also, she told them, she was transgender.

She had worried about this moment since transitioning a year earlier. How would the soldiers react? Would they accept a trans woman as their leader?

For a few seconds, no one spoke. Then there were nods of acceptance. Other soldiers started introducing themselves as well, sharing something about their own lives.

Then they all went to do morning physical training, just like every other squad in their battalion.

“At first, you could tell some were surprised,” Becraft recalled earlier this year. “But they saw I was genuine and respected my experience. Me being transgender just wasn’t that much of a thing.”

Becraft does not recognize herself in the Trump administration’s portrayal of transgender service members. The administration says, without providing evidence, that trans troops saddle the government with costly health care and corrode military effectiveness. An executive order last month asserted that being transgender “conflicts with a soldier’s commitment to an honorable, truthful and disciplined lifestyle.” Late on Wednesday, the Defense Department released a memo saying that trans troops now serving would be forced out.

“It is the policy of the United States government to establish high standards for service-member readiness, lethality, cohesion, honesty, humility, uniformity and integrity,” the memo explaining the policy said.

Essential troops may be able to get a waiver, the policy states, if they don’t transition and can show “compelling government interest in retaining the service member that directly supports warfighting capabilities.”

Some trans military members are challenging the policy in court.

Trans troops say their experiences in uniform hardly fit the dark descriptions of their critics. In two dozen interviews, many told The New York Times that despite the dire depictions being transgender in the military is no big deal.

The troops interviewed — three pilots, an explosives expert, a special operations officer, a nuclear reactor supervisor, a flight nurse, a missile battery commander and others — said they have faced some institutional barriers and heard a few cutting comments. But mostly, they say, they have been treated with respect. Their leadership has supported them, their peers have accepted them, and they have earned good performance reviews and promotions.

Officers and troops who are not trans said in interviews they had not seen any negative impact from trans troops.

Not that coming out was easy. Many of the trans troops said it was hard to come to terms with something they had been trying to deny for years. Becraft’s marriage didn’t survive. But when she told the Army that she was trans, her brigade offered her a temporary desk job with a more flexible schedule while she began her transition and went to therapy. A year later, she returned to leading soldiers.

“If anything, since I’ve transitioned, I’ve become a better leader,” Becraft said in an interview before the ban was announced. “I’m more comfortable. I don’t have to hide anything. Now, maybe, I have more wisdom, and I think my soldiers respond to that.”

Before the decision to discharge all trans soldiers was announced, she had hoped to be promoted to platoon sergeant this spring.

Many trans troops, like millions of others in America, saw the military as a patriotic pathway for opportunity — one that has become open to an increasingly diverse group of Americans.

The policy on trans military service, however, has been a tug of war between competing visions of the military for a decade. In 2016, six years after he signed a bill to let gay service members serve openly, President Barack Obama lifted a ban on transgender service. The next year, President Donald Trump announced a new ban, which President Joe Biden reversed in 2021.

During the Biden administration, thousands of trans service members who had been serving in uniform for years came out.

Even so, trans troops still make up only a tiny portion of the armed forces. There are currently 4,240 trans troops in the military, or about 0.2% of the force, according to numbers released Thursday.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has called trans troops “weird” and “a distraction.” A number of military officers who have commanded units with trans troops said that was not their experience.

“They’ve tried to make a big deal out of this, just like they did in the past with integrating women or African Americans, but it’s just a nothing-burger,” said Capt. Justin Long, who retired from the Navy in 2023 after more than 20 years in uniform. “I’ve had 15 trans sailors in my command over the years and never had an issue. The other sailors treat them like anyone else. All they want to know is, Will you show up and do your job?”

In recent years, the military has looked at gender affirming medical care the same way it has regarded broken bones, cancer diagnoses or scores of other medical issues that troops encounter. To receive treatment, there must be a diagnosis, a treatment plan and coordination with commanders to avoid interference with deployments or critical training.

“We don’t treat them any differently, and we shouldn’t,” Long said.

He said that forcing all trans troops out ignores the recommendations of senior leaders, and “flies in the face of science and reality.”

The Trump administration also claimed the cost of gender-affirming care is too high — though it had not offered any figures.

On Thursday, a federal judge ordered the Defense Department to release numbers for the first time. The figures showed the military has spent $52 million on gender-affirming care since 2015, or about $9,000 per individual. The department said about half of trans troops required no gender-affirming medical care, and only a quarter received gender-affirming surgery.

There is another cost that is rarely mentioned, said Cmdr. Emily Shilling, a decorated Navy fighter pilot: the cost of losing highly trained service members.

Shilling, who has flown 60 combat missions and is the president of SPARTA Pride, an advocacy organization for trans troops. She said many trans troops are people like her: senior personnel who will be difficult and expensive to replace.

The Navy spent millions of dollars on her training and flight hours, and sent her to graduate school to prepare her for greater responsibilities, she said. She now helps to oversee a multibillion-dollar carrier-launched drone program.

“We’re an extremely valuable asset to just throw away,” Shilling said. “Why would you want to get rid of someone you have so much invested in?”

© 2025 The New York Times Company