KAILUA-KONA — A feasibility study on a non-commercial marine fishing registry, permit or license system that was released Friday has laid the most stable groundwork to date for moving forward with an RPL system in Hawaii. ADVERTISING KAILUA-KONA — A
KAILUA-KONA — A feasibility study on a non-commercial marine fishing registry, permit or license system that was released Friday has laid the most stable groundwork to date for moving forward with an RPL system in Hawaii.
Bruce Anderson, state Department of Land and Natural Resources Division of Aquatic Resources administrator, said an RPL system would be beneficial for several reasons, chief among them as an avenue to generate funds for better fishery management activities, including enforcement.
Another benefit would be improved data to inform management by creating a dialogue between managers and non-commercial fishers in the state. Fishermen would not be required to report the types of fish they catch or where, but every optional survey filled out by licensed fishermen would supplement the DLNR database with previously absent information. Fishing rules also would be more easily and widely disseminated.
All of this is crucial, Anderson explained, as the landscape of fishery management has changed significantly.
“I think we face challenges today that we didn’t even a few years ago with coral bleaching and increased fishing pressures,” he said. “And I think it’s important that we at least look at the various options on what we can do to better manage our resources. Fisheries are on the decline throughout the state, and I think we need to do something different. We can’t just conduct business as usual. Something needs to change.”
Any attempt to implement a licensing system for non-commercial fishing would run through the state Legislature, as the DLNR doesn’t have the authority to enact such regulation on its own in a non-commercial context.
Anderson said there have been several bills tackling the issue, or at least portions of it, during the past two decades, but none progressed very far. Their failures likely were because the proposals were “half-baked,” not well researched or considered enough, he opined.
The feasibility study should go a long way toward informing legislation and creating a more sound foundation for it in the future.
“There’s been talk about doing this, and obviously it’s controversial and people have concerns,” said state Rep. Nicole Lowen, D-Kailua-Kona, Holualoa, Kalaoa, Honokohau. “They’ve been able to fish without having to check in with the government for their whole lives, and they may not be happy about the idea of having to do it in the future.”
Anderson said the administration is not proposing a bill for the 2017 legislative session, although any legislator could put forth legislation at any time. Should the DLNR decide to propose legislation, it won’t do so before discussing the matter thoroughly with stakeholders throughout the state.
The feasibility study didn’t single out a preferred option for an RPL system or delve too deeply into what it might look like, but Anderson provided some insight into the minutiae of any likely RPL construct.
First, the licensing fee would be far from onerous, probably falling in the $10-$20 range on an annual basis. There are more than 100,000 non-commercial fishers in Hawaii, meaning at least $1 million would be generated from licensing fees annually.
The DLNR manages the commercial fishing license program, but would need to expand to handle a non-commercial system. Anderson said it’s likely the costs would run somewhere between $200,000 and $300,000 annually to manage a computer-based, online system.
There also might be a handful of exemptions included in the system, which would likely be age-based. Several states exempt senior citizens and children from licensing fees, Anderson said. Those unable to afford the nominal fee for a license could also be exempt.
An exemption for Native Hawaiians would be unlikely, however, as the recommendations of the group who conducted the feasibility study advised against such a stipulation.
Anyone in the state would be eligible to apply for a license, and Anderson didn’t mention anything about restricting the number of licenses issued annually.
Nonresidents who use fishing charters also would be required to purchase a license, but could do so through the charter company in a reasonably quick process, Anderson said. Nonresident licenses likely would be more expensive than those issued to Hawaii residents.
Anderson stressed that nothing has been decided, and if the state pursues an RPL system, the process will be long and considerable.
“I talk about this fairly often, and it’s controversial in a district like Kona with a lot of fishing and recreation,” Lowen said. “On the other hand, we’re the only state that doesn’t have a recreational fishing permit, and the impact to the resources of recreational fishing are really big. I think it’s something that’s worth at least looking at, worth discussing.”
Email Max Dible at mdible@westhawaiitoday.com.
