Petition targets UH president finalist’s creds
HONOLULU (AP) — An online petition is questioning the qualifications of one of the finalists to become the next University of Hawaii president.
More than 350 people signed the petition against retired Lt. Gen. Frank Wiercinski. The petition’s accompanying letter claims Wiercinski, a three-star general who retired after leading U.S. Army Pacific for two years, isn’t qualified to lead a public education institution.
English professor Cynthia Franklin said the petition will be presented to the Board of Regents when it meets Thursday.
“His lack of qualification was compounded by the fact that he didn’t seem capable of thinking outside the military box,” she said.
Interim President David Lassner is the other finalist for the job. Lassner took over last year after M.R.C. Greenwood said she would step down to deal with health problems and spend more time with family.
The letter objects to Wiercinski’s lack of experience in higher-education leadership and a lack of social, cultural and historical knowledge of doing business in Hawaii.
Wiercinski told the newspaper he spent a lifetime defending the right to free speech, and he won’t ignore that oath just because of comments directed at him.
“I would only hope that I may be judged based on who I am as a person, my ability to lead and my willingness to serve,” he said.
Last week, students protested at least one of Wiercinski’s public forums, holding signs and shouting about over-militarization of Hawaii.
The regents are expected to select the president in June.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.