Planners get more time to update General Plan
Poised to miss a deadline set 10 years ago, the county Planning Department on Tuesday got a three-year reprieve to update the county’s General Plan.
The General Plan is the policy document for the long-range comprehensive development of Hawaii Island. Last updated in February 2005, it was scheduled to have an overhaul completed by February 2015.
The Planning Department came to County Council asking it to change the date in the General Plan so the county could start the process next year rather than complete it. It takes several years to update the lengthy document.
But Council balked at setting just a start date and letting the completion date be open-ended. So on Tuesday, Council voted 8-1 to amend the plan to allow 13 years between plans, rather than the current 10.
Kohala Councilwoman Margaret Wille wanted to give the Planning Department 11 years rather than 13.
“We didn’t do the right thing, the way it was supposed to have been done and now we’re saying let’s change it at the last minute,” Wille said.
But she agreed to support Puna Councilman Zendo Kern’s 13 years rather than there be no deadline at all.
“We’re going to set them up for failure,” Kern said. “It’s just not realistic. … Yet, we can have it so it’s accountable.”
“This thing has already failed,” responded South Kona/Ka‘u Councilwoman Brenda Ford, the lone dissenting vote.
Ford said the lack of accountability she’s seen in the Planning Department wouldn’t be tolerated in the private sector, where she came from. She laid the blame on former Planning Director Bobby Jean Leithead Todd, not the current director, Duane Kanuha. Both are appointees of Mayor Billy Kenoi.
“It’s OK to fail 100 percent. It’s OK to not even try,” Ford characterized the department’s attitude. “It’s not what the people expect of us. … They expect us on the council to do our jobs and they expect the administration to do their jobs.”
Kanuha previously said a combination of factors caused the delay.
First, the department, under Leithead Todd’s management, was busy creating Community Development Plans to allow more community input into the planning process. That pulled staff off the General Plan during the recession years, when furloughs and position freezes led to staff shortages.
Kanuha tried to put concerns to rest that were raised by Hilo Councilman Dennis Onishi. Onishi said extending the deadline would mean the plan amendments would come due in 2018, after a new mayor and administration are put in place in late 2016.
“A process like this shouldn’t be dependent on the personalities involved,” Kanuha said. “A process set up should carry it forward.”
The amended Bill 239 faces one more Council vote, where it is likely to pass with no more amendments.
The purpose of the General Plan is to guide the pattern of future development, identify the visions, values and priorities important to the people of the county, provide the framework for regulatory decisions, capital improvement priorities, acquisition strategies and other government programs, improve the physical environment of the county and “inject long-range considerations into the determination of short-range actions and implementation,” according to the preface of the document.
The 396-page plan can be viewed at cohplanningdept.com/community-planning/general-plan.
Email Nancy Cook Lauer at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.