Hanabusa: Age should not be part of Senate race
HONOLULU — U.S. Rep. Colleen Hanabusa of Hawaii says the way her competitor’s allies made age an issue in her bid for the U.S. Senate is insulting to voters.
Hanabusa is running against Sen. Brian Schatz for the seat that opened when Sen. Daniel Inouye died in 2012. Schatz was appointed to the seat by Gov. Neil Abercrombie, and the Democrats will face off in a primary in August. The election will likely be decided then in the heavily Democratic state.
In appointing Schatz, Abercrombie said Schatz, 41, would have the chance to build seniority through decades in the U.S. Senate.
He said Hanabusa, 62, wouldn’t because she’s too old.
“What you’re saying is, their vote doesn’t matter,” Hanubusa said in an interview with the Associated Press. “It’s almost like saying that somebody would be anointed for 40 years.
“I don’t know of any elected official who can guarantee that they’ll be in office for 40 years, which is, I think, the number that Abercrombie has used in the process.”
Abercrombie, who is running for re-election as governor this year, did not respond to a request for comment.
Schatz’ campaign, which has raised the issue of Schatz’ ability to develop seniority, declined to comment.
Until two years ago, voters in Hawaii were used to seniority, with Inouye serving since 1963 and Sen. Daniel Akaka serving multiple terms before he retired in 2012. In campaigning to serve the rest of Inouye’s term, Hanabusa and Schatz are each looking to distinguish themselves from one another after emerging as rivals in the same party.
The age comments are especially insulting toward women, Hanabusa said, because women often make choices to delay portions of their careers as they balance other demands in life.
“Imagine if you had children, on top of everything else, and you’re trying to establish a profession, plus do well in politics and so forth,” Hanabusa said. “Something gives, you know? I’d love to think that I’m a super human being, but I’m not. We make choices, and those are the choices that we make.”
Hanabusa does not have children. She chose to establish herself as an attorney before running for political office, she said.
Schatz has raised twice as much in campaign funds as Hanabusa. He received $3.4 million at the end of 2013 and spent about $996,000, according to the Federal Election Commission.
Hanabusa raised about $1.6 million and spent about $812,000 as of Dec. 31.
Even so, Hanabusa and her campaign staff are encouraged by the state of the race and think it will be decided by the “ground game,” she said.
As long as they can afford to compete for television air time before the election, they will be fine, she said.
“What concerns me is whether we have enough funds to be on the air, and we do,” Hanabusa said.
Hanabusa said plans to distinguish herself from Schatz based on her record as a strong advocate for the military and for refocusing the country’s military and economic interests on the Asia-Pacific region.
Hanabusa plans to fight for more than $200 million in military funds to Hawaii that were slashed from the federal budget, she said.
She also would say no to any proposed closure of military bases in Hawaii, she said.
“The president’s budget for the Department of Defense is not what we want for Hawaii,” Hanabusa said.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.